Toward Leadership Balance
Why do participants say they
attend the retreats?
Participants, mostly CEOs from the US and Canada, attend because they feel the
call, the
dream, the urge for something more -- here is a sample in their own
words:
I'm
striving for a life where I don't awaken anxious about my leadership challenges
and
how I can turn my organization around.
I am
tired of doing a series of projects or one night stands, rather than having a
long-term
sense of making a difference.
What's on the horizon? Am I really making a contribution? Or am I merely
attending meetings,
meeting deadlines, and doing activities?
I have had to make some very difficult decisions
that have estranged from me people who I
care deeply about. It makes me really
doubt myself. I need to know if there is something wrong
with me -- can I trust
myself?
I see
what I need to bring to my work, but I face a serious barrier of fear -- will
people think
less of me if I am all of who I am?
I
sense that I am much more than I allow myself to see, but I am afraid to look
inside for
fear of what I will find.
I
have become jaded. I believe in people and the importance of community in work,
but my
experiences of this have missed the mark -- this may be my last shot
before cynicism sets in.
What we do
We set a clear intention and
establish a sacred space for our work together. Each participant is given a
symbol.
This symbol is a teaching stick, similar to a walking stick but created
with symbols and form intended to teach.
Actually, the stick picks the
participant. Executives keep this stick with them at all times as a reminder of
that
which is highest within them; they are asked to observe all of its detail,
to notice how they feel about each of these
details, to ask the stick for
teaching -- in the hope it will reflect back to them that which they most need
to notice
about themselves right now.
One
participant is initially uncomfortable with her stick -- it is a jester stick
complete with a gaping
smile -- she feels the stick is laughing at her. Over
time she comes to understand that a fear of
being laughed at keeps her quite
serious. She
also asks, "If I
had the meaning of the stick upside
down initially, what other beliefs and
perceptions do I have upside down or backward?" Another
participant carries a
stick which
looks like a spinal column. It reminds him of his mother's words;
"Stand up straight." Further reflection begins to reframe the notion of
standing up straight -- it
is no longer an order. It is
an appreciation of the
strength and straightness he brings to his
organization....
The
other major activity is that of creating a symbol of the emerging SELF. This
activity has
profound implications for several reasons. First, the act of
creating a symbol is very a powerful
way to bring a concept into reality. Second, this engaged creativity tricks the ever-noisy
intellect into a
meaningful activity, opening the way for a deeper conversation and knowing.
And
finally, the activity can be counted on to surface all hidden resistance we have
to being
centered -- being balanced as leaders. It is simply not enough to
desire leadership balance --
we must also be willing to face our hidden
resistance and see it for the false barrier it is. The
resistance that emerges
in the retreat includes:
Leaders have difficulty
asking questions about anything they think they should know
something
about, but don't. It is very important to many of us to look like we know
who
we are and what we are doing. In fact, we believe strongly, in many cases,
that
to be innocent and open in our questions – to wonder -- will damage our
position with
employees and among our peers. This severely handicaps a
leader’s ability to learn new
things or experience the wonder of new realms.
Moving beyond the mind
as the primary processing unit for information is very difficult for
most
leaders. We are raised on a steady diet of analysis and logic. We study
trends and
go steadfastly in search of the tangible facts. In an emerging
environment typified by
lightening-speed systemic change and random
occurrence, it is important to learn to
process information using all other
senses -- and to take information in through the heart.
For example, ancient peoples of differing languages were able to communicate because their
communication came from the heart in the form of images. If sent and received from the
heart, messages could be understood easily. As a leader begins to communicate with the
deeper Self, this is also very valuable. Because the language of the deeper Self is not
necessarily English, the language of commerce, but something far more heart-felt, image-
based and ancient.
Many leaders believe that to give
attention to self-development, i.e. to explore who one
is, is a selfish and
luxurious act. "How can I spend time contemplating myself, when all
about me is falling apart?" Ultimately, if the leader must be whole in order for the
organization to be whole, the answer becomes "How can I not?"
"It is not safe to
be me" is perhaps the deepest level of resistance. Many leaders
have
sought diligently to be in the image of those who have been recognized and
successful
in the past. And all have personal experience of seeing what happens
to someone who
is different -- experiences ranging from patient tolerance to
outright oppression and harm.
It was two days into the retreat that one
executive said, "It finally dawns on me that I can
not say anything wrong
here -- nothing is considered inappropriate thinking or behavior.
There is
feedback, response and questioning, but there is also unconditional respect --
unconditional love. I'm not used to that.”
Self-sufficiency and
personal self-control are among the hallmarks of past leaders.
To admit
weakness, ask for personal assistance, or say "I don't know" is unthinkable to
many. But today, we are learning quickly that our very organizational survival
depends
on the power of the group and its ability to operate as a community.
And what is the
greatest enemy to learning and community? -- isolation and an
I can do it myself
mentality…
What happens beyond the resistance?
Repeatedly, each
retreat goes through predictable stages of group process and community
building.
[Note: We are grateful to M. Scott Peck, MD and the Foundation for
Community Encouragement for
well-documenting these stages which are italicized
below.]
The
retreat
begins by graciously looking good with each other and talking about how much we
have in
common (pseudo-community). Then resistance surfaces and chaos
ensues -- the group searches
for intellectual answers and explanations or
begins to try and "fix" each other rather than focus on
Self. Over time, within
a patient and loving environment, individuals begin to let go of the resistance,
empty old beliefs, and move into a space of emptiness and openness. Then
and only then, is it
possible to receive the gift of a new experience of Self and to know an
experience of community.
A heart once touched never regains its original
shape.... these experiences leave an imprint, a
strengthening, a sense of well
being, to be built on, to be expanded -- but never forgotten.
In the months following the retreats, participants say they carry
this sense of well being, sense
of Self,
back into the world. Each moves
forward with unique individuality, but a unifying thread
emerges:
more
risk-taking, stronger expression of personal voice and vision, and most notable,
increased belief in Self.